Topic Guide · Planning & Analysis

Campaign Planning

Designing, integrating, preparing, sequencing, and adapting information activities as coherent campaigns.

Curated listening notes and source-linked material from the existing analysis. These guides are starting points, not rankings.

Start listening
On this page

Listen & learn

Start Here

4 complementary conversations. The order is a suggested route in, not a score or a claim of agreement.

Suggested first listen

#132 Brian Russell on OIE Truths

Brian Russell

  • Offers practitioner principles for operations in the information environment, emphasizing preparation, persistence, collaboration, and integration.
  • Explains why understanding and relationships must be developed before a crisis rather than expecting an information capability to arrive fully effective.

Listening notes: reviewed episode summary.

Complementary perspective

#152 Dennis Katolin on Information Maneuver

Dennis Katolin

  • Connects information maneuver with the integration of cyber, electromagnetic, and other capabilities instead of treating each as a separate activity.
  • Emphasizes specific threat models and operational constraints, helping planners move beyond vague descriptions of an adversary’s capabilities.

Listening notes: reviewed episode summary.

Complementary perspective

#203 Scott Hall on Synchronizing Effects in the Information Environment

Scott Hall

  • Focuses on timing and sequencing: an information effect must align with the wider operation, not simply occur somewhere on its calendar.
  • Discusses practical synchronization tools and the planner’s coordinating role in bringing different capabilities into a coherent sequence.

Listening notes: reviewed episode summary.

Complementary perspective

#165 Aaron Schmidt on Information Considerations for Exercises

Aaron Schmidt

  • Explores how to make information a genuine planning consideration inside an exercise rather than an afterthought.
  • Examines the mismatch between desired effects, available resources, and adjudication—useful for recognizing when an exercise is teaching the wrong lessons.

Listening notes: reviewed episode summary.

What the Corpus Says

Selected existing syntheses, not new findings or a claim that guests agree.

Key Concepts & Frameworks

Conceptual starting points in the existing topic registry.

Challenges Practitioners Identify

Constraints and recurring problems described in the corpus.

Approaches Practitioners Recommend

Practitioner proposals, not independently validated recommendations.

Tools, Methods & Techniques

Methods and capabilities discussed in the corpus; effectiveness is not implied by inclusion.

Tensions & Open Questions

Both sides are retained. A tension is not an endorsement of either pole.

Canonical tension

Enterprise Coherence vs Local and Partner Adaptation

How should information activity balance enterprise-level coherence with the contextual knowledge, speed, access, and credibility of decentralized operators and partners?

Coordinate strategy, standards, authorities, and resources centrally

Common intent, doctrine, standards, resources, and authority prevent contradiction, duplication, and drift.

Delegate execution to local units, allies, and partners

Context, access, credibility, and tempo reside locally and require adaptation within intent.

Central intent and standards can coexist with decentralized execution, feedback, and exceptions.

Source: CT-005 · Enterprise Coherence vs Local and Partner Adaptation

Canonical tension

Operational Speed and Optimization vs Legitimacy-Preserving Guardrails

How much risk and procedural compression can information operations accept before short-term tempo damages oversight, credibility, or public trust?

Compress sensing, approval, experimentation, and adjustment cycles

Adversary adaptation and fleeting opportunities impose costs on slow approval and sequential planning.

Preserve legal, ethical, procedural, and values-based controls

Hard-to-reverse influence makes compressed decisions externalize legal, ethical, and trust harms.

Preauthorization, red teams, circuit-breakers, logs, and escalation thresholds can create fast lanes inside safeguards.

Source: CT-019 · Operational Speed and Optimization vs Legitimacy-Preserving Guardrails

Canonical tension

Crisis-Driven Improvisation vs Durable Institutionalization

How can institutions preserve crisis agility while converting recurring improvisation into durable capability rather than repeatedly cannibalizing long-term development?

Use rapid pilots, self-training, and surge adaptation during crises

Novel crises reveal requirements faster than standing systems respond, requiring pilots, temporary cells, and improvisation.

Build standing organizations, doctrine, authorities, and professional communities

Recurring demand cannot rely on surge labor and personal networks; it needs authority, funding, careers, governance, and lesson capture.

The sequence is often complementary: improvisation discovers practice, and selective institutionalization sustains it while preserving adaptation.

Source: CT-020 · Crisis-Driven Improvisation vs Durable Institutionalization

Connections Across the Corpus

Explicitly selected themes and narratives, with the reason each is relevant here.